Principles, problems and projects

Model of a nomadic wagon from 2nd century Odessa (Ukrainian museums).The idea of migration in prehistory, so long out of favour, is now back on the agenda.1Peter N. Peregrine, Ilia Peiros and Marcus Feldman (eds.), Ancient Human Migrations (2009); E. Lightfoot (ed), Movement, Mobility and Migration, Archaeological Review from Cambridge, vol. 23.2 (2008); J. Chapman and H. Hamerow (eds.), Migrations and Invasions in Archaeological Explanation, BAR International Series (1997). Does this mean a return to an old-fashioned view of the past? Should we see history as waves of invasion by conquering armies? Undoubtedly there were invasions. Many have been recorded since man learned to write. Yet we are also familiar with the massive migrations to the New World and Australasia in the 19th century, long after those territories had been claimed by European nations. Such migrants did not see themselves as invaders. Many were fleeing from invasions or oppression in their homelands. Millions of people were taken as slaves from Africa to the Americas.

Slavery has a long and brutal history. The Roman and Greek empires ran on it. Massive numbers of Europeans and Western Asians were enslaved in the process of their conquests. The barbarians who swept over Europe as the Roman Empire crumbled also took captives into slavery. Anglo-Saxons used slave labour. The Vikings were the greatest slave traders of their day. They supplied Iceland with captured Irish, and the Islamic Empire with human booty from Viking raids.2James Graham-Campbell, The Viking World (2001), pp. 18, 22, 34, 88-89, 91, 108, 110. Slavery within Europe was eventually stamped out, but between 1500 and 1800 hostilities between Muslims and Christians led to the capture of huge numbers of slaves. Some one million Muslims were enslaved in Europe and two million Christians taken into captivity in North Africa and the Near East. The feared Barbary pirates would capture ships and raid the coasts of the Mediterranean and Atlantic, in search of men, women and children to sell into slavery in North Africa.3Robert C. Davis, Holy War and Human Bondage: Tales of Christian-Muslim slavery in the Early-Modern Mediterranean (2009); Robert C. Davis, Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast and Italy, 1500-1800 (2004).

Since some slaves were simply worked until they dropped, it has been argued that slaves would leave few, if any, descendants. The reverse is probably true. Given the pervasive nature of slavery throughout antiquity, and the habit of taking slave concubines, it seems likely that most of us has a slave or two among our countless ancestors. There are other ways too in which the culture and the genes of a conquered people could be absorbed by the conquerors. Why destroy what is useful? The Romans admired Greek learning and employed Greek tutors. The Franks and Normans took over working systems of government from their predecessors. So instead of viewing invasion as a one-way process, we should visualise a cultural and/or genetic flow in at least two directions in many cases.

That supposes that the incomers maintained a presence in their original homeland. In some cases they did not. People who are fleeing disasters may never return. More often perhaps a movement which began as an expansion of territory ended up creating separate tribes or nations, who may even become enemies in the course of time.

By now it should be clear that not all migrations are invasions. Indeed there are so many varieties of migration and mobility that it is impossible to generalise about it. Mobility is built into the lifestyle of nomads.4H. Barnard and W. Wendrich (eds.), Archaeology of Mobility : Old World and New World Nomadism (2008). Human movement can have a massive impact, or a barely detectable one, on the cultural and genetic landscape of its destination. So new approaches to migration tend to ask a lot more questions than who, when and how? The impact of a migration will depend firstly on how heavily populated the destination region was beforehand. Farmers could overwhelm regions where a few hunter-gatherers roamed, since it can support so many more people to the acre. The price is being tied to the territory, at the mercy of drought, disaster and pestilence. If farming fails, then the stark choice may be migration or starvation.

However new arrivals to regions already densely settled by thriving farmers have broadly four options.

Only in the last case are incomers likely to completely change the culture and language of their destination. So language change is an important clue to mass migration. But the complexities are many. In some cases incomers will start off using one tactic and later switch to another, or drive the population out of one area, but rule a neighbouring one as overlord. Nothing can be taken for granted. The initial arrival of newcomers may be gradual or unobtrusive, giving little sign of a people who would become culturally dominant centuries later.

Horsemen of the steppes

Migrations across the Eurasian steppesNomads play by their own rules. Nomadic horsemen can move themselves and their herds thousands of miles, and turn into instant cavalry. Settled Europe and China felt the mighty fist of Genghis Khan and his Mongol horde in the Middle Ages. Centuries earlier chronicles wailed of the depredations of the Xiongnu, the Huns and the Turkic tribes. These herders of Central Asia could travel the vast steppes from Mongolia to Ukraine looking for greener pastures. A tribal territory could change in days. When bands united under a strong leader they swept across the plains creating huge empires.

The first people to domesticate the horse had the initial advantage. The latest research points towards a region near the Ural Mountains as the home of horse-riding.5D.W. Anthony, The Horse, The Wheel and Language (2007), chap. 10; A. K. Outram et al, The Earliest Horse Harnessing and Milking, Science, vol. 323. no. 5919 (6 March 2009), pp. 1332-1335. Just west of those mountains the forefather of the Indo-European languages developed at around the same time. Horsemen carried those languages from the European steppe into Asia. The Indo-European Scythians seem to have controlled the Silk Road from China to the West in its early days. But as the Turkic tribes grew in strength and pushed westward, the descendants of Scythians could join them or flee west before them. Studies of ancient DNA indicate the point at which East Asian peoples came to predominate over Western Eurasian in Central Asia. In Kazakhstan there were Western Eurasian lineages prior to the 7th century BC, followed by East Asian lineages appearing. Assyrian archives and Greek historian Herodotus record the impact on the West of this turn of the tide. Scythians migrated from Asia to the homeland of their ancestors, settling in what is now Azarbaijan and Ukraine.6W.Vogelsang, The Afghans (2002), pp. 83-90; P.R. Magocsi, A History of Ukraine (1996), pp. 25-28. The same trajectory across the steppe would later bring the Turks to Turkey, and the Huns and Mongols to Eastern Europe. The tide turned again as the Russians rose in power and pushed eastwards into Siberia. This shuttling between east and west wove a complex cultural and genetic tapestry. It will take the combined efforts of researchers in linguistics, archaeology, climatology, genetics and history to unravel its threads.7Bokovenko, N.A. Migrations of Early Nomads of the Eurasian Steppe in a Context of Climatic Changes, in E. Marian Scott, A., Yu. Alekseev and G. Zaitseva (eds.), NATO Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences Impact of the Environment on Human Migration in Eurasia, vol. 42 (2005), pp. 1568-1238; C. Schuh et al, Mobility in the prehistoric western Eurasian Steppe – an interdisciplinary approach, 6th Bone Diagenesis Meeting 18-21 September 2009, University of Bonn: Abstract Volume (2009), p. 60; O. Gokcumen et al, Genetic variation in the enigmatic Altaian Kazakhs of South-Central Russia: Insights into Turkic population history, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 136 (2008), no. 3, pp. 278 - 293.

Projects

Research projects in progress on aspects of human migration, transport and related topics in Western Eurasia include:

Europe or world wide

British Isles and Scandinavia

Central Europe

Mediterranean

Russia

Steppes

Notes

If you are using a browser with up-to-date support for W3C standards e.g. Firefox, Google Chrome, IE 8 or Opera, hover over the superscript numbers to see footnotes online. If you are using another browser, select the note, then right-click, then on the menu click View Selection Source. If you print the article out, or look at print preview online, the footnotes will appear here.

  1. Peter N. Peregrine, Ilia Peiros and Marcus Feldman (eds.), Ancient Human Migrations (2009); E. Lightfoot (ed), Movement, Mobility and Migration, Archaeological Review from Cambridge, vol. 23.2 (2008); J. Chapman and H. Hamerow (eds.), Migrations and Invasions in Archaeological Explanation, BAR International Series (1997).
  2. James Graham-Campbell, The Viking World (2001), pp. 18, 22, 34, 88-89, 91, 108, 110.
  3. Robert C. Davis, Holy War and Human Bondage: Tales of Christian-Muslim slavery in the Early-Modern Mediterranean (2009); Robert C. Davis, Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast and Italy, 1500-1800 (2004).
  4. H. Barnard and W. Wendrich (eds.), Archaeology of Mobility : Old World and New World Nomadism (2008).
  5. D.W. Anthony, The Horse, The Wheel and Language (2007), chap. 10; A. K. Outram et al, The Earliest Horse Harnessing and Milking, Science, vol. 323. no. 5919 (6 March 2009), pp. 1332-1335.
  6. W.Vogelsang, The Afghans (2002), pp. 83-90; P.R. Magocsi, A History of Ukraine (1996), pp. 25-28.
  7. Bokovenko, N.A. Migrations of Early Nomads of the Eurasian Steppe in a Context of Climatic Changes, in E. Marian Scott, Andrey, Yu. Alekseev and Ganna Zaitseva (eds.), NATO Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences: Impact of the Environment on Human Migration in Eurasia, vol. 42 (2005), pp. 1568-1238; C. Schuh et al, Mobility in the prehistoric western Eurasian Steppe – an interdisciplinary approach, 6th Bone Diagenesis Meeting 18 - 21 September 2009, University of Bonn: Abstract Volume (2009), p. 60; O. Gokcumen et al, Genetic variation in the enigmatic Altaian Kazakhs of South-Central Russia: Insights into Turkic population history, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 136 (2008), no. 3, pp. 278 - 293.